icey's ramblings

About the porcupine with a switchblade. Kirstin, cis, she/her/hers pronouns. "...I should ask less of people, and that in turn will make me happier?" I love the Bruce to my Tony! Sometimes I write fanfiction. You can read those here. Ask!
THE SCARF OF SEXUAL PREFERENCE
{ wear }
Love is love. Period.

Sep 14th at 7PM / via: agray002 / op: agray002 / 6 notes

agray002:

The Roosevelts: An Intimate History (preview)


PBS: "The Roosevelts"  

deadpresidents:

I don’t know about you, but beginning on tonight I’ll be spending every night of the next week glued to PBS while watching the latest documentary from Ken Burns and Florentine Films: "The Roosevelts".

Focusing on the three most significant and impactful members of one of America’s great…


Where are you, Ms Jess? I’m watching the Roosevelts. You should watch it with me. :(


agntq:

The Agent

(Clint’s favourite movie.)


Sep 13th at 9PM / via: dani-isnotonfire / op: warmbug / 120,365 notes
peacelovecajun:

warmbug:

trying to decode what you wrote to yourself.jpeg


i am laughing so hard at this

peacelovecajun:

warmbug:

trying to decode what you wrote to yourself.jpeg

i am laughing so hard at this


stuffimgoingtohellfor:

checkthemargins:

It is my headcanon that there is a gun on the table in this scene because The Winter Soldier has been trained to arm any of his handlers who are not already armed while in his presence so that, if they so choose, they can put him down at any time.Later, it takes Steve months to figure out why Bucky gives him a knife every time they’re in the same room.

#when i think I cannot have sadder thoughts about Bucky Barnes#something like this comes along feanorinleatherpants

stuffimgoingtohellfor:

checkthemargins:

It is my headcanon that there is a gun on the table in this scene because The Winter Soldier has been trained to arm any of his handlers who are not already armed while in his presence so that, if they so choose, they can put him down at any time.

Later, it takes Steve months to figure out why Bucky gives him a knife every time they’re in the same room.

 feanorinleatherpants


An Alternative School Reading List: Here Is Every YA Novel With Lesbians 

fuckyeahlesbianliterature:

Alternately, here’s the Goodreads list (I haven’t checked if there’s any that don’t overlap, though I suspect the Goodreads list is longer, because there’s 233 books on it.)



Sep 13th at 9PM / via: teamfreesexuality / op: thesheikah / 114,492 notes

(Source: thesheikah)


Sep 13th at 9PM / via: eosthetic / op: ridge / 324,477 notes

ikusaba:

supersmashkev:

this is on a level that i cannot reach

this is teen nick sitcom level

(Source: ridge)


Sep 13th at 9PM / via: fallloutbaby / op: makemelaughblog / 151,295 notes
alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.
High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.
But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.

High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.

But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.


Sep 13th at 9PM / via: madambitchtits / op: awwww-cute / tagged: cat. / 5,573 notes
awwww-cute:

Found this guy under the lawn mower. He’s here for good

awwww-cute:

Found this guy under the lawn mower. He’s here for good


Sep 13th at 9PM / via: i-like-girl-giants / op: meowoofau / tagged: cats. / 22,179 notes

meowoofau:

13 cats failing at hide and seek

As good as cats think they are at hiding from us, we know better.

(Source: meowoof.com.au)



Sep 13th at 9PM / via: fallloutbaby / op: skidaddle-o3o / 32,597 notes
carry-on-wayward-fallen-angel:

skidaddle-o3o:

#how to take a selfie

holy fucking shit

carry-on-wayward-fallen-angel:

skidaddle-o3o:

#how to take a selfie

holy fucking shit